Before Your Market Ebbs, Take Your Assets and Go

Most executives would agree that the last thinghave often done this by burning their boats and
they want to do is to leave behind the company'sbridges behind them so that survival could only be
original business, and go off serving anotheraccomplished by going forward.
market and need. In many ways, taking on a newBoth companies were also employing a venture
market and need is like being a start-up all overcapitalist's perspective in making decisions, looking
again except with higher costs (unless you canat choices in terms of opportunities lost as well as
acquire a business or some talent to help youprofits and cash flow gained.
implement) while moving more slowly.What else could these two companies have done
Consider a fish pond. If there isn't going to bethat would have provided even more ways to
enough water to support fish, the future looksharvest from their efforts? Take a moment to
bleak. You had better pack your fishing gear andthink about your own answers before looking at
head elsewhere, even if it means having to learnsome possibilities below.
to fish in a new way.First, since each company is betting on becoming
PMC-Sierra's predecessor company was focuseda leader in new applications, the companies could
on providing personal computer modems, ahave expanded their ability to learn how to solve
marketplace where it was the third largestmore kinds of related customer problems. Then, if
supplier in 1994. Storm clouds were forming forpart of a solution wasn't as robust and helpful as
that business as new technologies would requireanother part, the company could still have created
Digital Subscriber Line modems, which could cuta lead that reflected both efforts.
the future demand for the company's products.The technology evolution could have focused on
At the same time, the company's leaders weredelivering more kinds of advantages from the
very excited about the Internet becoming thesame development activities. As a simple
killer application for broadband as a technology.example, both companies could have looked for
Mr. Bob Bailey, PMC-Sierra's CEO says that thehow to make wireless and wired networks work
company was guided by a thought often sharedmore smoothly together from the end-users'
by Mr. Don Valentine of Sequoia Capital, "Greatperspective. That might have involved teaming up
markets make great companies."with people like Mr. Bernard Liautaud from
In the company's viewpoint, the chance to beBusiness Objects to create better ways to
number one in making chips for enabling theaccess data.
Internet would be just such an opportunity whileMany will object that neither company could
being a follower in modems for personalprobably have afforded to do more. But with the
computers would not. The decision was "not asright timing, PMC-Sierra and Centura could both
hard as it looked." By 1997, the company left thehave sold enough additional stock at a low cost of
modem business, and never looked back.capital during the height of the Internet craze on
Having made that decision similar to what aWall Street to have permitted such an expanded
venture capitalist would, PMC-Sierra continues tofocus.
look at development projects for new products inSecond, talent is a key ingredient in these kinds of
the same way. The investment can easily benew-product-driven business models. By directing
$30-50 million to create a new product that willsome of the applications for the new technologies
start a new market. If you do this particularto exciting problems, the companies might have
project, then top talent and money are notupgraded their ability to get better ideas. For
available for another project.example, there could have been a contest on the
Even with the company's success, it could onlyInternet to find problems that would encourage
afford to pay for a few of these as themany top people to leave what they are doing to
technology recession of 2001 hit.work on the challenge, much as Earthwatch
Down the coast from PMC-Sierra's Vancouverattracts talented people to support scientific
base, Mr. Scott Broomfield, CEO of Centuraexperiments all around the world.
Software, was wrestling with another, similarThird, adoption risk could have been greatly
challenge in 2001. Although the company had beenreduced by lining up lead steer customers to
leader in developing software for client serverinvest in the new technologies in order to help
technology, Centura had missed the boat forthem develop their own next generation of
morphing its offerings into the Internet. Next?improved business model. With many wireless
Mr. Broomfield decided to move the company intocarriers worldwide to choose from yet providing
a totally new business model, that built from thefew differentiated offerings, both companies could
lessons of its earlier experiences in developingprobably have found at least one willing partner
client server software. This new business modelfrom the wireless industry. Such a partner would
would also be employed in a new marketplace,have been helpful for application knowledge,
wireless communications. With a band of 20 goodfinancial resources, and access to their customers
people, the software could be created at nowho wanted to solve specific problems.
greater cost than rebuilding the company'sFourth, the companies are planning to provide
existing base in its current market.products to create solutions. Yet, when
The only remaining risk for the new model wascompanies succeed the biggest value will be
one of getting adoption. To help deal with that theprovided to the services that are enabled by the
company was relaunched with the name Mbranenew technologies.
(as in membrane) around the idea of usingPart of the business model could have examined
technology to solve customers' problems in termsat where the most value would be accrued by
that customers who were not technologists couldworking with those who use the products or the
understand. Further, Mbrane would focus onservices they make possible. Also, they could
empowering workers in organizations to make ithave looked at ways to create value through
easy to get the information they needed throughtechnical solutions that are primarily captured as
wireless technology.intellectual property, rather than as whole
Pricing would be done in ways to make it easierbusinesses. In fact, it might have been cheaper to
for customers to choose to use the software. Totake that route than to actually design the next
pay for the new developments, the majority ofgeneration of products. Certainly that's the
the old business was sold. Only time will tell howcircumstance for PMC-Sierra.
well this will turn out, but Mr. Broomfield feels thatWhat other ideas do you have?
he has taken a risk with a favorable ratio ofIs the current recession just a blip for your
risk-to-potential-reward.industry . . . or a sign that you had better move
As you can imagine from both cases, it probablyto a new opportunity?
helped focus attention on the new activities toCopyright 2009 Donald W.
eliminate the older ones. Military commanders